Contact Us

The Unified API Layer for Microsoft AI

Fastlane connects your AI agents to Microsoft 365, Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, D365 F&O, CRM and more through a secure, governed intelligence layer.

Laycon API connecting D365 F&O, automation, and AI, D365 ERP, MCP server

The Challenge

Most companies are experimenting with AI. But building enterprise-ready Copilots requires stitching together dozens of Microsoft APIs and services.

Teams must manage integrations across:

This creates:

The result: teams build AI features, but struggle to build AI platforms.

The Intelligence Layer for the Microsoft Ecosystem

Fastlane enables enterprise-grade AI and Copilot experiences by exposing governed business services through a unified API layer. Instead of giving AI access to raw ERP data, Fastlane provides:

This transforms D365 F&O from a system of record into a governed system of intelligence, without touching the core ERP.

Laycon API connecting D365 F&O, automation, and AI, D365 ERP, MCP server

What You Can Build With Fastlane

AI Copilots

Create assistants that can read, write, search, and automate across Microsoft tools.

AI Automation

Trigger workflows across Teams, Outlook, SharePoint, and enterprise systems.

AI-Native Applications

Embed intelligent capabilities directly into internal apps.

Enterprise AI Platforms

Give your organization a secure foundation for deploying Copilots at scale.

Platform Capabilities

Unified Microsoft API

Access Microsoft services through a single developer-friendly interface.

AI Model Agnostic

Use Azure OpenAI today. Switch models tomorrow without rebuilding your platform.

Tool-Based Execution

Allow AI agents to perform real actions across enterprise systems.

Built-in Governance

Enforce permissions, compliance, logging, and security across all AI activity.

Enterprise AI Architecture with Fastlane

D365 F&O remains the system of record.

Fastlane sits on top as a unified API and business service layer, exposing governed actions instead of raw data.

AI agents, Copilot extensions, Power Apps, and Power Automate authenticate using Microsoft Entra ID and invoke Fastlane APIs. Fastlane enforces security, policy, throttling, and audit before executing actions in D365 or other connected systems.

AI agents may use MCP for discovery and invocation, but they always execute business logic through Fastlane.

This separation is what makes AI safe to scale.

D365 ERP MCP vs API, function calling

Stop building AI features. Build your AI platform.



MCP vs Tool Calling: A Practical Comparison

MCP gets a lot of buzz lately thanks to the marketing hype and can offer advantages in some cases. But in most scenarios, Tool calling is more flexible, scalable, and easier to manage. Let's break it down.

1️⃣ Setup & Hosting

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
Hosting Requires deploying an MCP server or using first-party MCP Only needs APIM + Azure Function (serverless)
Setup Complexity High - MCP is a new platform that requires backend deployment, configuration, and maintenance Low - Uses standard API calls familiar to developers
Frontend Integration Usually more complex due to server endpoints Easy - front end (Power Apps or React) can call backend with JSON payload
Winner: Tool Calling - simpler, less infrastructure to manage.

2️⃣ Flexibility

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
Adding new actions Requires backend code/deployment Easily add new functions dynamically via Frontend
Multi-function sequence Hard-coded or requires backend updates Fully controlled by frontend
Parameter changes Backend must be updated Front end can pass different parameters at runtime
First-party MCP Black box logic with limited visibility, cannot customize Full control and customization
Winner: Tool Calling - more adaptable to changing business needs.

3️⃣ Security & Control

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
API access control MCP may expose actions; backend must secure Backend controls all API calls; OpenAI only suggests JSON
Validation Validation is restricted to MCP server rules Backend validates structured JSON before execution
User permission isolation Harder to enforce Backend enforces per-user access control easily
Winner: Function Calling - safer if backend validates requests.

4️⃣ Maintainability

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
Updating actions Requires redeployment JSON functions updated without backend changes
Adding new systems Complex Just add new function in JSON
Debugging MCP logs are centralized but less granular Tool calling provides more detailed logging for easier debugging
Winner: Tool Calling - easier to maintain and expand.

5️⃣ Cost

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
Infrastructure MCP server + maintenance or pay for first-party MCP Serverless backend, much cheaper
Scaling Needs MCP server scaling Azure Functions scale automatically
Licensing MCP may require enterprise license Pay-as-you-go using OpenAI + Azure Functions
Winner: Tool Calling - more cost-effective and scalable.

6️⃣ Response Handling & Auditability

Aspect MCP Tool Calling
Structured responses Limited Fully structured JSON (parameters + function name)
Audit / logging MCP logs are available but may be limited Backend can log every JSON response and API payload
Error handling Hard-coded Backend can handle errors per action dynamically
Winner: Tool Calling - safer and more reliable with structured responses.